It looks like Rob Conery inadvertently followed number 3 from my previous post. So I guess I was right, that sure didn't take very long. 🙂
Loved the article? Hated it? Didn’t even read it?
We’d love to hear from you.
It looks like Rob Conery inadvertently followed number 3 from my previous post. So I guess I was right, that sure didn't take very long. 🙂
Loved the article? Hated it? Didn’t even read it?
We’d love to hear from you.
Wouldn’t this post qualify as well? I think this is what we call "meta blogging" – aka "meaningless" blogging about blogging. Sort of boring.
The post wasn’t inflammatory – it was poorly written. This post:
http://blog.wekeroad.com/2007/10/10/imploding-rails-jesus-dhh-and-the-uncle-ben-principle/
Is inflammatory :).
Damn, called out on my own blog. And I’ll have you know that "meta blogging" is all the rage. 🙂 Anyway, I prefer to call it "leeching on someone else’s success".
And yes, your linked post is way more inflammatory than anything I have spewed yet. Although I did get more than a couple of e-mails for my Programmer Dresscode (http://www.codethinked.com/post/2007/12/The-Programmer-Dress-Code.aspx) post and my original description of Bjarne Stroustrup. 🙂 Too bad I changed it.
LOL good stuff :):). People always tell me that I write challenging posts for readers – and then when I write boring posts they tell me I lost my edge. Fickle… fickle…
I have no edge, I am round like a circle.